Prone Position Endoscopic Transthoracic Release With Simultaneous Posterior Instrumentation for Spinal Deformity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective series of 15 consecutive adult patients with spinal deformity who underwent endoscopic transthoracic release with simultaneous posterior instrumentation while positioned prone. OBJECTIVES: To describe the technique and clinical results of endoscopic transthoracic release performed with the patient prone (as opposed to lateral) on the concave side for scoliosis or on either side for kyphosis, with simultaneous posterior exposure, instrumentation, and correction of the deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Use of endoscopic surgical techniques is rapidly advancing across all subspecialties. These techniques can be used to expose and operate on the spine in a less invasive fashion, thus avoiding damage to other tissues and facilitating earlier mobilization and rehabilitation. Current endoscopic techniques with the patient in the lateral decubitus position mimic open thoracotomy. A new technique is described with the patient positioned prone, which allows simultaneous posterior exposure. METHODS: Preoperative Cobb angle or thoracic kyphosis angle, maximal correction bending films, and postoperative Cobb angle or kyphosis angle were measured and compared. All perioperative morbidity, intraoperative complications, and surgical variables were prospectively documented and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative technical problems with the endoscopic equipment or instruments and no immediate, 6-month, or 2-year postoperative complications related to the endoscopic component of the procedure. In the scoliosis patients, the average correction was 60%. In the kyphosis patients, the average correction was 39%. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracic endoscopic techniques, compared with thoracotomy, offer a less invasive method of accessing the anterior spinal column, with the benefits of an excellent view of the area of the spine being instrumented, minimal soft tissue disruption, and an improved cosmetic result. With the simultaneous technique, staged or subsequent procedures can be eliminated, and a circumferential structural release as well as control of the mobilized spine can be achieved. This simultaneous technique can be extended for use in correction of a variety of thoracic spinal pathologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".