Modification to the renneting functionality of casein micelles caused by nonionic surfactants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonionic emulsifiers of small molecular weight such as polysorbates are widely used in dairy products. Nevertheless, the mechanism of interaction between these surfactants and milk proteins is not yet fully understood. This work investigated the effect of Tween 20 on casein micelles by studying the renneting behavior of skim milk in the presence of different amounts of surfactant. The presence of Tween accelerated both the first and second phase of renneting in skim milk. The gel obtained showed a higher elastic modulus than that of a skim milk gel, but also showed similar brittleness. By varying the size of the surfactant (Tween 20 or Tween 80) as well as the colloidal state of the proteins in solution, it was possible to demonstrate that the surfactant did not have a direct effect on the activity of the enzyme, but rather had a direct effect on the casein micelles. The effect of surfactant on the gelation point was reduced by increasing surfactant size. The presence of Tween caused an increase in the size of the micelles without affecting their stability. In addition, Tween did not alter the amount of caseins free in the serum phase. These findings can contribute to improving our ability to custom design final structures in rennet-induced gels, though further studies are needed to fully understand the mechanism at play when casein micelles are enzymatically cleaved in the presence of nonionic surfactants of small molecular weight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".