Mechanism of the lithiumiodine exchange in an iodothiophene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solutions of 2-lithio-5-methylthiophene (4) were characterized using DNMR techniques and shown to be a mixture of monomer and dimer in THFEt2O (3:2). The hypervalent iodine ate complex 5 (Ar2ILi+), a presumed intermediate in the LiI exchange with 2-iodo-5-methylthiophene, was observed by 13C and 7Li NMR spectroscopy at low temperatures (130 °C). At higher temperatures, the ate complex coalesced with 2-lithio-5-methylthiophene. A kinetic scheme was developed, which accounts for the exchange of the monomer 4M, dimer 4D, and 2-iodo-5-methylthiophene (6) with the ate complex 5. The rates of the various exchanges were obtained through a DNMR analysis of the variable temperature 13C and 7Li NMR spectra, and the thermodynamic and activation parameters were calculated. The monomer 4M and the ate complex 5 have similar reactivity as aryl donors in the LiI exchange reaction, but 4M is at least 1000 times as reactive as the dimer 4D towards the iodide.Key words: halogenmetal exchange, lithium iodinate, iodine ate complex, lithium reagent, aggregate reactivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".