MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993416776 · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181988175

The Role of Mood Disorders in Exercise-Induced Cardiovascular Reactivity

2009· article· en· W1993416776 on OpenAlexaff
Roxanne Pelletier, Kim Lavoie, Jennifer L. Gordon, André Arsenault, Tavis S. Campbell, Simon Bacon

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychosomatic Medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart InstituteConcordia UniversityHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMcGill UniversityUniversity of CalgaryFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureHeart rateInternal medicineMedicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionReactivity (psychology)MoodStressorHeart failureRate pressure productDiastolePhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Increased cardiovascular (CV) reactivity has been associated with worse CV prognosis. Though mood disorders (MDs) have been associated with increased CV reactivity during behavioral stressors, the extent to which MDs and their interaction with coronary heart disease (CHD) influences exercise-induced CV reactivity has not been evaluated. Methods: Five hundred twenty-six patients underwent nuclear exercise stress testing. Cardiovascular parameters were assessed at rest, every 2 minutes during exercise, and at peak exercise. MDs were measured using a structured psychiatric interview, the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders, and CHD was defined as having a history of myocardial infarction, revascularization, heart failure, and/or cerebrovascular event. Results: CHD patients exhibited lower peak exercise heart rate (F = 9.40, p = .002) compared with patients without CHD. Submaximal data showed that patients with CHD had a slower rate of increase of heart rate (F = 4.29, p = .04) and diastolic blood pressure (F = 3.27, p = .04). There was an interaction of CHD and MDs, indicating that in patients with CHD, the rate of submaximal increase in systolic blood pressure (F = 3.08, p = .047) and rate-pressure product (F = 5.13, p = .006) was greater in patients with a MD compared with those without a MD. These differences were not observed in patients with no CHD. No other main or interaction effects of MDs and CHD were observed. Conclusion: Though MDs alone do not seem to be associated with higher levels of stress CV reactivity, their combination with CHD leads to increased submaximal exercise-induced CV reactivity. Prospective studies are needed to explore the causal relationship between these variables. CV = cardiovascular; HR = heart rate; CHD = coronary heart disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure; MDs = mood disorders; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; RPP = rate-pressure product; BP = blood pressure; SPECT = single photon emission computed tomography; SES = socioeconomic status; BRS = baroreceptor sensitivity; BMI = body mass index; MI = myocardial infarction; MOSMI = Mechanisms and Longitudinal Outcomes of Silent Myocardial Ischemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychosomatic MedicineSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207