MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993487865 · doi:10.1002/iub.166

Death receptor 5‐recruited raft components contributes to the sensitivity of Jurkat leukemia cell lines to TRAIL‐induced cell death

2009· article· en· W1993487865 on OpenAlexaff
Yifan Min, Juan Shi, Yaxi Zhang, Shilian Liu, Yanxin Liu, Dexian Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurkat cellsLipid raftAcid sphingomyelinaseCeramideFADDCell cultureProgrammed cell deathSphingomyelinLeukemiaCell biologyT-cell leukemiaApoptosisBiologyReceptorCancer researchChemistryT cellSignal transductionBiochemistryCaspaseImmunologyMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study we demonstrated Jurkat leukemia cell lines of TIB152 and TIB153 with different sensitivities to recombinant soluble TRAIL cytotoxicity. TRAIL receptor death receptor 5 (DR5) was constitutively localized in the rafts in both cell lines. FADD, caspase-8, and PI3K-p85 subunit were recruited into DR5 lipid rafts of TIB152 but not in TIB153 cells. The expression and enzyme activity of acid sphingomyelinase, which digests sphingomyeline to produce ceramide and plays an essential role in lipid raft assembling, were higher in the rafts of TIB152 than in TIB153. These data provide evidences that DR5-recruited raft components contribute to the different sensitivity of Jurkat leukemia cell lines to TRAIL-induced cell death and may throw some light on the development of better therapeutic strategies for the cancer cells resistant to TRAIL treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUBMB LifeSame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207