Deformation capacity of ultra‐high strength concrete flexural elements subjected to inelastic load reversals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Ductility and plastic rotational capacity of flexural elements constructed with concrete strengths up to 175 MPa were investigated experimentally. Ten exterior beam–column sub‐assemblages were tested under cyclic displacements that represented a severe seismic event. The test variables included the concrete strength, the bottom/top reinforcement ratio, the transverse reinforcement ratio, and the shear‐span‐to‐depth ratio. The increase of concrete brittleness with the higher strength concretes did not inhibit the reinforced concrete flexural elements from attaining comparable ductility and deformation capacity with respect to counterpart elements constructed with normal strength concrete. However, the maximum concrete strength that could be used in achieving highly ductile elements depended on the other test variables of the beam element including the bottom/top reinforcement ratio, the transverse reinforcement ratio in the hinge region, and the shear‐span‐to‐depth ratio. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it