MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Risks of Stillbirth and Early Neonatal Death by Day of Week

2004· article· en· W1993552328 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zhong‐Cheng Luo, Shiliang Liu, Russell Wilkins, Michael S. Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityStatistics CanadaHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsphyxiaGestational agePediatricsLogistic regressionNeonatal deathObstetricsDemographyPregnancyFetusInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unless labor is timed for high-risk pregnancies or there are differences in the quality of perinatal care, births on different days of the week should have similar outcomes. Not many such studies have been done, but all of them point to a higher risk of stillbirth and/or early neonatal death for infants born on weekend days rather than on weekdays. The investigators, using a Canadian database of 3,239,972 births taking place in the years 1985 through 1998, sought associations between these outcomes and the day of the week at birth. These women represented all births recorded in Canada during the period under review except for Ontario. Births were 24% less frequent on weekend days than during the week. Stillbirth rates were lowest on Mondays and highest on Saturdays. Neonatal deaths were considerably more frequent among infants born on Saturdays and Sundays (Fig. 1), particularly those caused by asphyxia. These patterns were consistent throughout the review period. Cause-specific excess risks for stillbirth varied widely. Stillbirths resulting from congenital anomalies were much less frequent on weekend days than on weekdays. Cause-specific excess risks for early neonatal death also varied widely, ranging from +28% for asphyxia and immaturity to −3% for congenital anomalies. On logistic regression analysis, controlling for completed weeks of gestational age, there was no apparent excess risk of either stillbirth or early neonatal death on weekends. For preterm infants, the gestational age-specific risks of early neonatal death were similar or slightly lower for infants born on weekend days.Fig. 1: Early neonatal death rates (overall and resulting from asphyxia) by day of week at birth. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Risks of stillbirth and early neonatal death by day of week. Reprinted with permission from CMAJ 2004;170: 337–341. Copyright © Canadian Medical Association, 2004. All rights reserved.Any excess risk of stillbirth or early neonatal death on weekend days in this Canadian study was much smaller than has been reported from other countries. The present findings suggest that, in Canada, accessibility to quality obstetric and neonatal care is maintained on weekends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207