MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993560268 · doi:10.1103/physreve.84.041202

Kullback-Leibler entropy in the electron distribution shape relaxation for electron-atom thermalization

2011· article· en· W1993560268 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Reinel Sospedra‐Alfonso, Bernie D. Shizgal

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsPhysicsElectronDistribution functionRelaxation (psychology)Atomic physicsLorentz transformationThermalisationMomentum (technical analysis)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the thermalization of energetic electrons dilutely dispersed in inert gas atomic moderators, with and without the presence of an external electric field. We investigate the shape relaxation of the electron distribution function relative to the steady-state distribution by means of the Kullback-Leibler entropy. The departure of the distribution function from a local Maxwellian parametrized by the temperature of the electrons is also considered with a functional analogous to the Kullback-Leibler entropy. For neon and argon as moderators, we found no evidence for the formation of a local Maxwellian followed by a slower relaxation to equilibrium. The momentum-transfer cross section for e-Ne collisions is almost constant with energy, whereas the e-Ar momentum-transfer cross section has a deep Ramsauer-Townsend minimum and a strong energy dependence. The role of the Ramsauer minimum in the relaxation processes is investigated. The time-dependent Lorentz-Fokker-Planck equation is solved for the speed distribution of the electrons with a finite difference method. A pseudospectral method is also used to investigate the spectral properties of the Fokker-Planck operator. In spite of the multi-exponential time dependence of the speed distribution function, we show that a single average relaxation time can be defined to characterize the relaxation to equilibrium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207