Genetic profiling of dendritic cells exposed to live‐ or ultraviolet‐irradiated <i>Chlamydia muridarum</i> reveals marked differences in CXC chemokine profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is a major cause of sexually transmitted disease worldwide for which an effective vaccine is being actively pursued. Current vaccine efforts will be aided by elucidating the interaction between Chlamydia and dendritic cells (DCs). Protective immunity appears to develop slowly following natural infection in humans, and early vaccine trials using inactivated C. trachomatis resulted in partial, short-lived protection with possible enhanced inflammatory pathology during re-infection. Thus, immunity following natural infection with live chlamydia may differ fundamentally from immune responses induced by immunization with inactivated chlamydia. We explored this conjecture by studying the response of DCs exposed to either viable or inactivated [ultraviolet (UV) -irradiated] chlamydia elementary bodies (EBs; designated as Live-EB and UV-EB, respectively) using Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays. Thirty-one immunologically characterized genes were differentially expressed by DCs following exposure to Live-EB or UV-EB, including two glutamic acid-leucine-arginine cysteine-X-cysteine (ELR CXC) neutrophil chemoattractant chemokines, Cxcl1 (KC), and Cxcl2 (MIP-2). Up-regulation of these genes by Live-EB as compared to UV-EB was verified by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and increased chemokine secretion was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay both in vitro and in vivo. Immunofluorescence and fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of chlamydia-infected lung tissue confirmed that Live-EB but not UV-EB induced significant DC and neutrophil infiltration during infection. These observations demonstrate that the development of an antichlamydial immune response is dramatically influenced by chlamydial viability. This has implications as to why early inactivated chlamydial vaccines were ineffective and suggests that new vaccine design efforts may benefit from in vitro DC screening for ELR chemokine expression profiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".