MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1993640033 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v64i3.1028

Use of Commercially Available Heparin Solution for Neonates

2011· article· en· W1993640033 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Brandi Newby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeparinMedicineIntensive care medicineObstetricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Use of Commercially Available Heparin Solution for NeonatesArterial lines are commonly used to allow access for monitoring of neonates in neonatal intensive care units.Catheter occlusion and thrombosis are complications associated with the use of umbilical artery catheters, one type of arterial line used in this setting.The incidence of clinically symptomatic thrombosis with this type of catheter has been estimated at 1% to 3%. 1 To minimize these complications, staff in neonatal intensive care units use various strategies, including choice of catheter design, material, and location of the catheter tip.1,2 In most neonatal intensive care units, some type of heparin infusion is also used to help maintain patency of the catheter.2 The frequency of catheter occlusion is reduced when heparin is infused through the umbilical artery catheter.2 A continuous infusion of heparin is required, as heparinization of the flush solution is ineffective on its own. 2 The exact amount of heparin required to maintain patency and avoid adverse effects is unknown.However, care is required in selecting the dosage, because heparin is a high-risk medication that carries a risk of hemorrhage if too much is administered.Recently reported medication incidents have illustrated this risk.For example, in the neonatal intensive care unit of a Texas hospital, 14 to 17 neonates received heparin overdoses in the summer of 2008. 3 No ready-to-administer solutions appropriate for neonates were commercially available at the time, 3 so the required heparin solutions had to be prepared in the pharmacy.However, pharmacy staff prepared the heparin solutions incorrectly, and the neonates received up to 100 times more heparin than had been ordered.3 In Canada, a premixed heparin solution, at a concentration of 2 units/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride, is commercially available.4 Whenever possible, using commercially available premixed solutions is preferable to the preparation of solutions by nurses or pharmacists to reduce the risk of mixing errors.However, the concentration of 2 units/mL is greater than the 0.25 to 1 unit/mL recommended for neonates by the American College of Chest Physicians. 1 Therefore, at many Canadian sites, the premixed solution is not used, and heparin for neonates (at the recommended concentration) is prepared in 0.45% sodium chloride.5 At a hospital in British Columbia, the charts of neonates who received commercially available heparin 2 units/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride from 2006 to 2009 were reviewed.During the study period, 66 neonates received heparin via an umbilical artery catheter.The mean gestational age of the patients was 27.3 weeks (range 24 to 40 weeks), and the mean birth weight was 1040 g (range 460 to 4075 g).Sixty of the neonates initially received the commercially available solution, and the other 6 initially received a solution prepared on the ward, using 0.45% sodium chloride, but were switched to the commercially available

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→