A Telomere-mediated Chromosome Fragmentation Approach to Assess Mitotic Stability and Ploidy Alterations of LeishmaniaChromosomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have used a telomere-associated chromosome fragmentation strategy to induce internal chromosome-specific breakage of Leishmania chromosomes. The integration of telomeric repeats from the kinetoplastid Trypanosoma brucei into defined positions of the Leishmania genome by homologous recombination can induce chromosome breakage accompanied by the deletion of the chromosomal part that is distal to the site of the break. The cloned telomeric DNA at the end of the truncated chromosomes is functional and it can seed the formation of new telomeric repeats. We found that genome ploidy is often altered upon telomere-mediated chromosome fragmentation events resulting in large chromosomal deletions. In most cases diploidy is either preserved, or partial trisomic cells are observed, but interestingly we report here the generation of partial haploid mutants in this diploid organism. Partial haploid Leishmania mutants should facilitate studies on the function of chromosome-assigned genes. We also present several lines of evidence for the presence of sequences involved in chromosome mitotic stability and segregation during cell cycle in this parasitic protozoan. Telomere-directed chromosome fragmentation studies in Leishmania may constitute a useful tool to assay for centromere function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".