Intradermal Vaccination of Dendritic Cell–Derived Exosomes Is Superior to a Subcutaneous One in the Induction of Antitumor Immunity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because dendritic cell (DC)-derived exosomes (EXO) harbor many important DC molecules involved in inducing immune responses, EXO-based vaccines have been extensively used to induce antitumor immunity in different animal tumor models. However, it is not clear which route of EXO administration can induce more efficient antitumor immune responses. In this study, we compared the antitumor immunity derived from EXO vaccine by way of the two common administration routes, the subcutaneous (s.c.) and the intradermal (i.d.) administrations. Our data showed that the i.d. EXO administration resulted in more EXO-absorbed DC migrating into the T-cell areas of draining lymph nodes than the s.c. administration. Interestingly, the i.d. EXO administration also resulted in an enhanced ovalbumin (OVA)-specific CD8(+) T-cell proliferation and CD8(+) CTL effector responses in vivo, compared to the s.c. administration. Similarly, compared to the s.c. vaccination, the i.d. vaccination induced stronger antitumor immunity in the animal tumor model. Therefore, the i.d. EXO vaccination is superior to the s.c. one and should be considered when EXO-based vaccine is designed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".