MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993748373 · doi:10.2118/2006-113-ea

Effect of Heterogeneity on Advection-Reaction Problem in Porous Media Using a Stochastic Eulerian Flow Model

2006· article· en· W1993748373 on OpenAlexafffund
Ebrahim Fathi, I. Yücel Akkutlu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEulerian pathAdvectionPorous mediumFlow (mathematics)MechanicsComputer scienceStatistical physicsPorosityEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringMathematicsApplied mathematicsPhysicsThermodynamicsLagrangian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Flow and transport in a porous medium coupled with a reaction is influenced by the medium heterogeneity. The effective macroscopic equations for flow and reaction must incorporate such information. In this paper, we consider upscaling of the advection-reaction problem using spectral theory. The approach follows original work by Gelhar and Axness [2]. The reaction occurs between an injected chemical and a stationary mineral residing in the pore space. A one-step nonlinear bimolecular dissolution reaction takes place between the two chemical species. The heterogeneity is in flow permeability field, which is random and correlated in space. Initial distribution of the mineral surface area is considered to be linearly correlated with the permeability field. A stochastic analysis of flow, transport and reaction is performed using firstorder perturbations. The reaction front propagation in the heterogeneous medium is then analyzed and field-scale expressions are obtained for the coefficients in reaction rate, effective flow velocity and longitudinal macrodispersivity. The heterogeneity is shown to influence flow, macrodispersion and reaction in porous medium. Furthermore, its presence develops inter-dependency between the three existing mechanisms. Introduction Behavior of fluids is influenced by the porous medium heterogeneities. While an attempt is being made to develop a quantitative description of flow in porous media in a scale much larger than an average pore size, dealing with the realm of heterogeneity becomes a fundamental and challenging problem. Finding appropriate average parameters which can be applied to flow, transport and reaction in the scale of interest, and at the same time being able to incorporate the influence of intrinsic heterogeneity on the modeling and predictions, is desired during an investigation. Rapid developments in theoretical research of fluid flow in porous media in a probabilistic framework have been experienced during the last two decades. This progress was motivated by the fact that (1) the medium is always heterogeneous, i.e., it has a large degree of variability in grain size, and shows a complex spatial structure at larger scales; (2) lack of knowledge of the detailed local structure of these spatial variations and (3) difficulties in obtaining sufficient data related to spatial and temporal distributions of mass and momentum variables, dictated by these large-scale variations. When dealing with subsurface processes such as movement of ground water, transport of its contaminant, recovery of crude oil and natural gas, the heterogeneities are more pronounced due to extremely complex diagenesis processes of the sediments [1]. Heterogeneity of a porous medium could be represented in terms of random quantities which characterize its pore structure, e.g., its mineral concentrations and internal surface area, permeability and porosity etc. In practice, spatial variations in permeability are often used to describe the medium heterogeneity. These variations subsequently influence flow, transport and reaction variables. Therefore, the latter are also random quantities, more precisely random fields with spatial and temporal arguments. Then, these random fields appear in the stochastic partial differential equations describing the phenomenon of interest. The results obtained by a variety of tools are then represented in terms of their statistical moments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207