MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993779520 · doi:10.1021/ja049605b

Electrochemistry and Optical Absorbance and Luminescence of Molecule-like Au<sub>38</sub> Nanoparticles

2004· article· en· W1993779520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHOMO/LUMOChemistryAbsorbancePhotoluminescenceCyclic voltammetryBand gapAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanoparticleLuminescenceElectrochemistryMoleculePhotochemistryPhysical chemistryNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes electrochemical and spectroscopic properties of a well-characterized, synthetically accessible, 1.1 nm diam Au nanoparticle, Au(38)(PhC(2)S)(24), where PhC(2)S is phenylethylthiolate. Properties of other Au(38) nanoparticles made by exchanging the monolayer ligands with different thiolate ligands are also described. Voltammetry of the Au(38) nanoparticles in CH(2)Cl(2) reveals a 1.62 V energy gap between the first one-electron oxidation and the first reduction. Based on a charging energy correction of ca. 0.29 V, the indicated HOMO-LUMO gap energy is ca. 1.33 eV. At low energies, the optical absorbance spectrum includes peaks at 675 nm (1.84 eV) and 770 nm (1.61 eV) and an absorbance edge at ca. 1.33 eV that gives an optical HOMO-LUMO gap energy that is consistent with the electrochemical estimate. The absorbance at lowest energy is bleached upon electrochemical depletion of the HOMO level. The complete voltammetry contains two separated doublets of oxidation waves, indicating two distinct molecular orbitals, and two reduction steps. The ligand-exchanged nanoparticle Au(38)(PEG(135)S)(13)(PhC(2)S)(11), where PEG(135)S is -SCH(2)CH(2)OCH(2)CH(2)OCH(3), exhibits a broad (1.77-0.89 eV) near-IR photoluminescence band resolvable into maxima at 902 nm (1.38 eV) and 1025 nm (1.2 eV). Much of the photoluminescence occurs at energies less than the HOMO-LUMO gap energy. A working model of the energy level structure of the Au(38) nanoparticle is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it