Bibliographic record
Abstract
This letter is in reference to the recent article on the use of botulinum toxin type A (Botox®; Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) in the role of chronic myofascial pain and the corresponding editorial.1,2Although the use of Botox® is regarded as a safe therapy for many patients,3,4it is our concern that Botox® contains 0.5 mg human serum albumin per 100-U vial and that this is not often discussed in the literature despite increasing usage.5Other preparations of botulinum toxin used in the world today also contain some amount of human serum albumin (Dysport®; Ipsen Ltd., Berkshire, United Kingdom, and Myobloc®; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA).6The human albumin used in Botox® is purchased from a division of the Bayer Corporation (Leverkusen, Germany). Measures taken to prevent disease transmission to humans include screening of donors, plasma testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B, and pasteurization of the albumin preparation. Therefore, the risk of transmitting viruses such as hepatitis A, B, and C, non-A non-B hepatitis (NANB), and HIV is considered extremely remote. There still exists an extremely remote possibility that some prion causing disease such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob or variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob may be transmitted in the preparation because prions are not inactivated by current sterilization methods.6Bayer corporation also produces Plasbumin® (human albumin) as a plasma substitute, and there is a clear statement on its product monograph that no case of viral or prion disease transmission has ever been documented with its use.With the injection of human albumin, there is a possibility of inducing a hypersensitivity reaction resulting in symptoms such as fever, chills, urticaria, malaise, nausea, rash, and asthenia. The product monograph for Botox® indicates that the drug is contraindicated if a patient has a “… known hypersensitivity to any ingredient in the formulation,”7and therefore, patients should be questioned about previous exposure to human albumin or albumin transfusions.A survey of four other clinicians in our pain clinic indicated that although most knew there was albumin in each vial of Botox®, none knew exactly how much was in each vial, nor were any of the clinicians informing their patients of its presence. Obviously, a Jehovah’s Witness patient would want to know about the human albumin and would likely refuse treatment with this product. Further, we believe that all patients should be informed about the presence of human albumin in botulinum toxin therapy as part of their informed consent. Some non–Jehovah’s Witness patients may have a psychological and emotional reaction to the knowledge they are being injected with a blood product, although it is unlikely to create any adverse effect by its presence. We propose that this concern should be addressed before therapy with botulinum toxin and that medical literature should highlight this issue because dissemination of this information is vital to ethical practice.*Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. paul.tumber@uhn.on.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".