Acute Mitral Regurgitation in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: What Is the Cause?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients presenting with acute chest pain and suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who have nonobstructive coronary disease on angiography, but new regional wall motion abnormalities are often diagnosed with takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC). The cause of TTC is often physical or emotional stress, and this clinical syndrome occurs more often in women than men. When hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) accompanies TTC, the mechanism must be carefully elucidated, as systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve can cause significant MR and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. These patients can be conservatively managed, with SAM-associated MR and LVOT obstruction resolving with medical therapy as TTC-associated left ventricular (LV) dysfunction resolves, as opposed to true ACS where further intervention for MR is often necessary. This case report describes 2 cases of TTC presenting with severe MR, who were initially thought to have ACS-associated MR caused by ischemia, but on further echocardiographic interrogation were found to have SAM-associated MR which resolved along with resolution of LV wall motion abnormalities on medical therapy by follow-up echocardiography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".