MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993874324 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2198247

A Cooperative Multiagent Framework for Self-Healing Mechanisms in Distribution Systems

2012· article· en· W1993874324 on OpenAlexaff
Aboelsood Zidan, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart gridDistributed computingComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)AutomationGridMulti-agent systemReliability engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Artificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because of society's full dependence on electricity and high cost of system outages, one important goal is to increase the reliability of the power system, which means that a salient attractive feature of smart grid is its self-healing ability. Smart grids will develop and enhance the automation of distribution by operating in a distributed manner through new digital technologies such as monitoring, automatic control, two-way communication, and data management. In this work, the smart grid concept and technologies have been applied to construct a self-healing framework for use in smart distribution systems. The proposed multiagent system is designed to locate and isolate faults, then decide and implement the switching operations to restore the out-of-service loads. The proposed control structure has two layers: zone and feeder. The function of zone agents in the first layer is monitoring, making simple calculations, and implementing control actions. Feeder agents in the second layer are assigned to negotiation. The constraints include voltage limits, line current limits, and radial topology. Load variation has been taken into consideration to avoid the need for further reconfigurations during the restoration period. The results of the simulation conducted using the new framework demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations235
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207