Effect of intra‐operative end‐tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure on tissue oxygenation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postsurgical infection risk is correlated with subcutaneous tissue oxygenation. Mild hypercapnia augments cutaneous perfusion. We tested the hypothesis that peripheral tissue oxygenation increases as a function of arterial PCO2 in surgical patients. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to intra-operative end tidal PCO2 of 3.99 (control) or 5.99 kPa (hypercapnia). All other anaesthetic management was per protocol. Tissue oxygen partial pressure, transcutaneous oxygen tension, cerebral oxygen saturation, and cardiac output were measured. Mean (SD) subcutaneous tissue oxygen tension was 8.39 (1.86) kPa in control and 11.84 (2.53) kPa hypercapnia patients (p = 0.014). Cerebral oxygen saturation was 55 (4)% for control vs. 68 (9)% for hypercapnia (p = 0.004). Neither cardiac index nor transcutaneous tissue oxygen tension differed significantly between the groups. Mild intra-operative hypercapnia increased subcutaneous and cerebral oxygenation. Increases in subcutaneous tissue oxygen partial pressure similar to those observed in patients assigned to hypercapnia are associated with substantial reductions in wound infection risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".