Central Cholecystokinin Activity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Panic Disorder, and Healthy Controls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and panic disorder (PD) coexist with a high frequency. However, the nature of this relationship remains obscure. We have proposed that PD and IBS may share a common dysfunction of the central cholecystokinin (CCK) system. To test this hypothesis, we assessed whether the enhanced panicogenic response to CCK-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) observed in PD is also present in IBS. METHODS: Eight psychiatrically healthy IBS patients, 8 PD patients with no history of IBS, and 12 normal controls received a bolus injection of CCK-4 and placebo on two separate days in a double-blind, randomized fashion. RESULTS: Consistent with previous findings, panicogenic sensitivity to CCK-4 was enhanced in PD patients relative to controls. In contrast, IBS patients exhibited a response that was comparable to controls. Interestingly, CCK-4-induced nausea and abdominal distress were decreased in IBS patients relative to the other groups. No diagnostic difference was noted for cardiovascular response to CCK-4. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that IBS patients with no lifetime psychiatric history do not share the CCK-2 receptor dysfunction implicated in the pathophysiology of PD and that this dysfunction may not be a common mechanism for both CNS and enteric nervous system disorders. Nevertheless, the results suggest that a dysfunction of the CCK system may be involved in the pathophysiology of some enteric symptoms associated with IBS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".