Media representation of federally sentenced women and leisure opportunities: Ramifications for social inclusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent policy developments, such as those guided by the federal Correctional Service of Canada's document Creating Choices, have been directed toward women‐centred approaches to rehabilitation of federally sentenced women in Canada. Content analysis of media response to a women‐centred event involving the community and federally sentenced women serves as a platform for reflective examination of the values around leisure and the possible challenges to social inclusion in the presence of conflicting societal values. National and local newspaper reports of a leisure and wellness day called "Women's Day Away" and reports related to a federal prison for women were examined over a nine‐month period. Initially intangible elements embedded in the media representations of leisure opportunities for federally sentenced women appeared to work against the intent of policy recommendations, and weaken the prospect for social inclusion on release. However, further investigation suggested that the local media provided space for negotiation of conflict and tension that enabled the emergence of a shared understanding of difference, ultimately increasing the potential for social inclusion. Résumé Certain développements politique récents comme ceux guidés par le document ≪ La création de choix : Rapport du groupe d'étude sur les femmes purgeant une peine fédérale ≫ produit par le Service correctionnel Canada sont orientés vers la réadaptation des femmes condamnées au Canada. Une analyse de contenu examinant la couverture des événements communautaires par les médias et la participation d'un group spécifique ‐ les femmes purgeant une peine federale nous donnent une plateforme pour évaluer les valeurs autour des loisirs et des défis possibles à l'inclusion sociaux en la présence des valeurs sociales contradictoires. L'analyse du programme ≪ relevé d'un jour pour les femmes purgeant une peine fédérale ≫ par les médias et plusieurs rapports reliés à une prison fédérale pour femmes ont été examinés sur une période de neuf mois. Au début les couvertures de ces événements par les médias semble opposer les recommandations de la politique générale et critiquer l'inclusion sociale après la relâche. Cependant, une analyse des principaux quotidiens démontre comment des médias locaux ont traité à fond l'événement. Cette couverture locale semble avoir encourager une négociation du conflit permettant une reconnaissance partagée des différences, augmentant finalement le potentiel pour l'inclusion sociale. Keywords: leisuresocial inclusionincarcerated womenwomen‐centred programmingmedia representationMots‐clés: loisirsinclusion socialefemmes incarcéréesprogrammation femme centréereprésentation de médias
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".