Coupled‐perturbed Hartree–Fock treatment of infinite periodic systems: Application to static polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities of polydiacetylene, polybutatriene, and interacting pairs of polyacetylene chains
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Static longitudinal polarizabilities (α) and second hyperpolarizabilities (γ) are determined for three quasi‐one‐dimensional polymeric systems using a new crystal orbital coupled‐perturbed Hartree–Fock method. Calculations of α and γ for polydiacetylene and polybutatriene at two different geometries are analyzed in terms of the alternation of bond lengths along the carbon backbone. For the third polymer, polyacetylene, the treatment is applied to a pair of chains in the two different configurations that occur in a stretched fiber. The results are in marked contrast to those previously obtained for short and medium‐sized oligomers. In order to relate the pair interaction effect between infinite chains to the bulk susceptibility of the natural fiber additional finite oligomer calculations are carried out. This allows us to discuss the role of finite chain length distribution, many‐body interchain interactions, and electron correlation. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it