Clinical Success of Mandibular Distraction for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Resulting From Micrognathia in 10 Consecutive Japanese Young Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, obstructive sleep apnea has gained attention as one of the causes of sudden death in young children. There have been some reports, mainly from the United States and Europe, that mandibular distraction osteogenesis is effective as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome caused by micrognathia in young children. However, there has not been any report yet in Japan. In this study, we performed mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices in 10 young children with obstructive sleep apnea. To enable distraction to be performed smoothly without any difficulties, we modified a surgical procedure by adding an osteotomy of the coronoid process to a vertical ramus osteotomy. Postoperative evaluations using cephalograms and polysomnography were performed, and great improvements were observed. As a result, all patients either avoided or were weaned from tracheostomy, and very good results were obtained similar to those in reports from the United States and Europe. We report our experience in Japan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".