MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993953131 · doi:10.1139/b07-038

Identification of the full-length <i>Hs1<sup>pro-1</sup></i> coding sequence and preliminary evaluation of soybean cyst nematode resistance in soybean transformed with <i>Hs1<sup>pro-1</sup></i> cDNA

2007· article· en· W1993953131 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michael D. McLean, Gordon J. Hoover, Bonnie Bancroft, Amina Makhmoudova, Shawn M. Clark, T. W. Welacky, Daina H. Simmonds, Barry J. Shelp

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoybean cyst nematodeBiologySugar beetGeneCoding regionMolecular biologyPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsPotato cyst nematodeGenetically modified cropsNematodeTransgeneHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hs1pro-1 gene reportedly confers resistance to the beet cyst nematode in wild beet and sugar beet. Here, we tested the hypothesis that Hs1pro-1 confers resistance in soybean against the soybean cyst nematode (SCN). The full-length Hs1pro-1 coding sequence, which encodes a predicted polypeptide of 490 amino acids, was first acquired then expressed in ‘Westag’ soybean using a constitutive octopine synthase – mannopine synthase promoter. Thirty T0 lines that successfully expressed the Hs1pro-1 gene, as indicated by both polymerase chain reaction and reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction analyses, were generated. Bioassay of the T1 progeny from these lines revealed that only five T0 lines grew normally and exhibited a high degree of SCN resistance. On average, these T1 transgenic progeny were about 70% more resistant to SCN than susceptible control cultivars. These preliminary data suggest that Hs1pro-1 is a promising candidate for genetically engineering SCN resistance in elite, locally adapted soybean cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207