Lewis base complexes of AlH3: structural determination of monomeric and polymeric adducts by X-ray crystallography and DFT calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The AlH3 adducts of TMEDA (Me2NCH2CH2NMe2), DIOX (O(CH2CH2)2O), TEA (Et3N), BDMA (PhNMe2), and TMPDA (Me2NCH2CH2CH2NMe2) have each been characterised by single-crystal X-ray diffraction at low temperature, by (1)H, (14)N and (27)Al NMR and FT-Raman and FT-IR spectroscopy, and by DFT calculations and elemental analysis. Hence, AlH3·TMEDA and AlH3·DIOX are both shown to adopt a polymeric structure, with the bidentate ligand bridging two Al centres, each of which adopts a trigonal bipyramidal (TBP) arrangement with equatorial hydride moieties. The 1 : 2 adduct AlH3·2BDMA is monomeric but the geometry at the Al centre resembles closely that of the polymeric TMEDA and DIOX complexes. AlH3·TEA alone adopts a monomeric structure in which the Al centre is tetrahedrally coordinated by three hydride and one amine ligand. The Al-L bond distance of 2.0240(17) Å for AlH3·TEA is the shortest of all the complexes in this study, and AlH3·TEA also possesses the shortest Al-H bonds. AlH3·DIOX has the shortest Al-L bond distance of the polymeric species (2.107(14) Å) on account of the higher electronegativity of the oxygen donor. The structure of AlH3·TMEDA was determined at low temperature (monoclinic space group P2(1)/c), and salient features are compared to the previous room temperature study, for which a highly disordered orthorhombic space group (P2(1)2(1)2(1)) was reported. The polymeric structures appear to be stabilised by a number of intermolecular interactions and unconventional hydrogen bonds; these are most pronounced for AlH3·DIOX, whose chains are connected by highly directional C-H···H-Al bonding with an H···H distance of 2.32(6) Å.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".