Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractIn the article “Antonin Artaud et la surréa-liste,” the author studies in two unpublished texts Artaud's use of the list and its link to the Surrealist writing techniques. Through the détournement of psychiatric discourse, the “surrea-list” enables the poet to develop an alternative conception of the body contesting the practice of anatomy.Keywords: Antonin ArtaudSurrealismPsychiatryPsychoanalysisPoetry Notes1 Abrégé O.2 Je tiens à remercier la Faculté des Arts de l’Université McGill pour le soutien qu’elle a apporté à mes recherches, Guillaume Fau, conservateur à la Bibliothèque Nationale de France et responsable du fonds Artaud, pour son aide et ses suggestions, de même que les bibliothécaires de la salle Richelieu pour leur assistance.3 Cette photographie, commentée par Artaud dans Nouveaux écrits de Rodez (67–72) et reproduite dans ce même ouvrage, a été prise par Artaud à la demande de son psychiatre Gaston Ferdière pour illustrer un article que ce dernier avait consacré à la chanson. Elle exhibe une figure anthropomorphe crucifiée. Le poète a disposé des feuilles de chou sur une croix formée d’un bâton et d’une canne qui supporte sa veste.4 Abrégé GR.5 Artaud nomme également « encarts » (Oeuvres complètes 11, 20) les phrases qui sont écrites à même ses dessins afin de souligner l’indissociabilité entre dessin et écrit. Ce terme d’« encartement » est essentiel pour comprendre la pratique artistique d’Artaud (Voir Derrida 65).6 Abrégé OC.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMaxime PhilippeMaxime Philippe has written a dissertation on the work of Antonin Artaud, a French avant-garde poet, artist, and theorist of the theatre. His dissertation examines Artaud's debate with the psychiatric and psychoanalytical disciplines of the time. His article “Artaud, l’hérétique” in L’Esprit Créateur 55.3 (Fall 2013) tries to rethink the Surrealist experience through the figure of the heretic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".