MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994051706 · doi:10.1177/193229680700100214

Prospects and Challenges for Islet Regeneration as a Treatment for Diabetes: A Review of Islet Neogenesis Associated Protein

2007· review· en· W1994051706 on OpenAlex
Alexander Fleming, Lawrence Rosenberg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeogenesisIsletEndocrinologyInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusBiologyInsulinRegeneration (biology)Cell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes mellitus results from inadequate insulin action, which can be viewed as a consequence of the limited ability to restore beta cells after they are lost as the result of metabolic exhaustion, autoimmune destruction, or surgical insult. Arguably, a uniformly effective therapeutic pathway to address all forms of diabetes would be to reverse the restrictions on beta-cell and islet regeneration. The development from progenitor cells of islets with normal endocrine function does occur in adult humans; it is referred to as islet neogenesis. The induction of islet neogenesis is an important, if not essential, therapeutic approach for curing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and could be valuable in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well. Islet neogenesis associated protein (INGAP) is the first therapeutic candidate to be identified as the result of a purposeful search for an endogenous molecule with islet neogenic activity. It was found that partial obstruction of the pancreatic duct in hamsters induced islet neogenesis; under this condition, a neogenesis-promoting activity was identified and partially purified from a soluble tissue fraction. A 168-kDa protein product of the cloned gene was found to be responsible for the neogenesis activity. This molecule named INGAP contains an active core sequence of amino acids called INGAP peptide. Results from in vitro, animal, and human studies suggest that INGAP and INGAP peptide are neogenic in at least several vertebrate species, including humans. INGAP has since been found to be a member of the family of Reg proteins, which are found across and in multiple versions within species and are closely associated with embryonic and regenerative processes. Clinical results suggest that INGAP peptide can be a suitable neogenesis therapy, but optimization of the therapy and more data are required to fully access this potential. Understanding of the signaling pathways of INGAP and other related Reg proteins is a promising means of advancing therapeutic development for people with T1DM and T2DM. The quest for the fundamental restorative approach to lost insulin secretion is an enticing target for drug development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it