MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994056505 · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.023405

Intensity clamping measurement of laser filaments in air at 400 and 800 nm

2010· article· en· W1994056505 on OpenAlexafffund
J.-F. Daigle, Agnieszka Jaroń-Becker, Sima Hosseini, T.-J. Wang, Y. Kamali, G. Roy, Andreas Becker, S. L. Chin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateAtomic physicsLaserFluorescenceIonWavelengthPopulationIntensity (physics)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ fluorescence excited by laser filaments formed from laser pulses at 400 and 800 nm propagating in air is investigated. A comparison showed that, when excited with 400 nm photons, the fluorescence from the first negative band of ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}{}^{+}$ was enhanced by a factor of 6.4 while that of the second positive band of neutral ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ remained relatively constant. The enhanced ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}{}^{+}$ signal is attributed to a more efficient inner-shell multiphoton process (to the ${B}^{2}$${\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{u}^{+}$ state) at 400 nm leaving a larger population of ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}{}^{+}$ ions in the excited state. On the other hand, the stable fluorescence from neutral ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ is due to the fact that the plasma density is more or less the same at both wavelengths. Using these results, a theoretical model is developed to determine the clamped intensities of the laser filaments at 400 and 800 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207