Help-Seeking Patterns in HIV/AIDS Outpatients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates factors associated with requests for professional services, made by newly registered HIV/AIDS Clinic outpatients, referred by general practice physicians to a large urban hospital serving a broad metropolitan/rural area in Canada. Professional service requests were divided into two primary help-seeking categories: practical support (assistance with financial aid, housing, medication costs, etc.) and emotional support (i.e., psychological counselling). Slightly more than half of the sample (51%) of people living with HIV/AIDS (PHA) requested professional services. Service requesters are indistinguishable from non-requesters on a large number of variables, including age, gender, family awareness of HIV/AIDS diagnosis, time elapsed since diagnosis, employment status, spousal status, overall support network size, physical health indicators (Karnofsky Performance Status, CD4 count, symptoms, opportunistic infections) and receipt of community support services elsewhere. Similarly, requesters and non-requesters report comparable levels of overall perceived social support and quality of life. However, requesters of practical support services report significantly fewer friends, lower emotional-informational social support and poorer quality of life due to body pain than non-requesters. Requesters of emotional support services report experiencing significantly lower positive social interaction compared to non-requesters. Implications for the provision of practical and emotional support services for PHA are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".