MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994135813 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2004.88.6.681b

A New Tomato leaf curl virus from Mayotte

2004· article· en· W1994135813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Michel Lett, Hélène Delatte, Florence Nazé, Bernard Reynaud, Anli Liachouroutu Abdoul-Karime, Michel Peterschmitt

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBegomovirusBiologyWhiteflyLeaf curlCoat proteinPolymerase chain reactionPlant virusIntergenic regionVeterinary medicineBotanyHorticultureVirologyGeneVirusGeneticsGenomeRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In June 2003, symptoms of stunting and leaf curling resembling symptoms of tomato leaf curl disease, as well as reductions in yields, were observed on tomato plants in the western (Combani and Kahani) and eastern (Dembeni, Kaoueni, and Tsararano) regions of Mayotte, a French island in the Comoros Archipelago located in the northern part of the Mozambique Channel. The whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), was observed colonizing tomato plants and other vegetable crops at low levels. Overall, 13 leaf samples with symptoms were collected from tomato plants among the five regions and tested for the presence of begomoviruses using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with two sets of degenerate primers designed to amplify two regions of the A component of begomoviruses. Primers MP16 and MP82 amplify an approximately 500-bp fragment located between the intergenic conserved nonanucleotide sequence and the first 200 bp of the coat protein (CP) gene (2). Primers AV494 and AC1048 amplify the approximately 550-bp core region of the CP gene (3). Six leaf samples, one from Combani, three from Dembeni, and two from Kahani, gave a PCR product of the expected size with both sets of primers. No PCR products were obtained with degenerate primers designed for begomovirus DNA B or β. The approximately 500- and 550-bp PCR products from one sample each of Combani (EMBL Accession Nos. AJ620912 and AJ620915, respectively), Dembeni (EMBL Accession Nos. AJ620911 and AJ620914, respectively), and Kahani (EMBL Accession Nos. AJ620913 and AJ620916, respectively) were sequenced. For the 489-bp sequences obtained with the MP16/MP82 primer set, the three isolates had 90 to 95% nucleotide identity (DNAMAN; Lynnon BioSoft, Quebec). The most significant sequence alignments (NCBI and BLAST) were with begomoviruses; 80 to 83% nucleotide identity was obtained with the Tomato yellow leaf curl Morondava virus (TYLCMV) isolates from Madagascar (EMBL Accession Nos. AJ422123 and AJ422124), 80 to 82% nucleotide identity was obtained with the South African cassava mosaic virus (SACMV) isolates (GenBank and EMBL Accession Nos. AF155806 and AJ422132), and 79 to 81% nucleotide identity was obtained with the East African cassava mosaic Malawi virus (EMBL Accession No. AJ006460). For the 522-bp sequences obtained with the AV494/AC1048 primer set, 95 to 97% nucleotide identity was shown between the three isolates. The most significant sequence alignments were also with begomoviruses; TYLCMV isolate Morondava (EMBL Accession No. AJ422125) with 86 to 88% nucleotide identity, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus isolates (GenBank and EMBL Accession Nos. AF105975, AJ489258, AB014346, AF024715, AF071228, and X76319) with 86 to 87% nucleotide identity, and SACMV isolate M12 (EMBL Accession No. AJ422132) with 85 to 86% nucleotide identity. According to the current taxonomic criteria for the provisional classification of a new begomovirus species, nucleotide sequence identity in the core region of the CP <90% (1), the tomato begomovirus from Mayotte is a new species and is provisionally named Tomato leaf curl Mayotte virus. References: (1) J. K. Brown et al. Arch. Virol. 146:1581, 2001. (2) P. Umaharan et al. Phytopathology 88:1262, 1998. (3) S. D. Wyatt and J. K. Brown. Phytopathology 86:1288, 1996.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207