A Prospective, Controlled Multisite Study of Psychosocial and Behavioral Change Following Women's Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite its proven benefits and need, women are significantly less likely than men to participate in and complete cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Thus, there are few reports of CR outcomes among women, particularly when compared with women who do not participate in CR. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess psychosocial and behavioral changes, comparing women who participated in CR with those who did not. METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven female cardiac inpatients from three hospitals consented to participate in a prospective study, and 110 (79%) were retained 18 months postdischarge. A mailed survey discerned CR participation 9 months postdischarge. Quality of life (Short-Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Summary [SF-12 PCS and MCS]), exercise behavior (Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II [HPLPII]), Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale (EBBS), and anxiety and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) were assessed in hospital and 18 months postdischarge. RESULTS: Fifty-one (45.1%) women self-reported participating in CR at 1 of 18 sites, and site-verified participation was 82.43% +/- 29.97% of prescribed sessions. For CR participants, paired t tests assessing change from hospitalization to 18 months postdischarge revealed significant improvements in physical quality of life (p < 0.001), anxiety (p < 0.05), and exercise behavior (p = 0.01). Women who did not participate in CR experienced significant improvements in physical quality of life (p = 0.02), and depressive symptoms (p = 0.03) but not exercise behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Following a cardiac event, female patients improved their physical quality of life and affect, but only patients who participated in CR increased their exercise behavior. Given the cardiac benefits of exercise and that women are often sedentary and given that this exercise behavior was sustained post-CR, these findings are significant. Randomized controlled trials of women's CR outcomes are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".