MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994219644 · doi:10.1353/crv.2011.0022

A "21st Century Economic Agenda for America": Barack Obama's Pre-Presidential Economic Jeremiads

2011· article· fr· W1994219644 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Willie J. Harrell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidential systemRhetoricDemocracyOrder (exchange)HappinessAtonementPolitical economyPolitical scienceSociologyLawEconomicsPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay argues that Barack Obama's pre-presidential rhetoric serves as economic jeremiads that urge atonement in order to initiate a plan of economic change that will transform America and unite Americans in the common cause fulfilling the nation's democratic mission of providing life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of all citizens. Above all else, Obama's pre-presidential economic jeremiads attempt to paint a vivid picture of the real danger facing the American economic system and call Americans to act immediately in order to restore the faltering economy. Le présent essai allègue que la rhétorique pré-présidentielle de Barack Obama sert de jérémiades économiques qui incitent à un grand pardon afin d'amorcer un plan visant le changement économique qui transformera l'Amérique et unira les Américains dans une cause commune qui remplit la mission démocratique de la nation de fournir la vie, la liberté et la recherche du bonheur chez tous les citoyens. Les jérémiades économiques pré-présidentielles d'Obama tentent par-dessus tout d'illustrer en couleurs vives le danger réel auquel est confronté le système économique américain et incite les Américains à agir immédiatement afin de restaurer l'économie chancelante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.008
Scholarly communication0.0200.010
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0050.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207