Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The similarity solutions are presented for the wall flow which is formed when a smooth planar jet of power-law fluids impinges vertically on to a horizontal plate, and spreads out in a thin layer bounded by a hydraulic jump. This problem is formulated analogous to radial jet flow problem and the solution procedure is accounted for by means of similarity solution of the boundary-layer equation [1] for Newtonian fluids. For the convenience of analysis, the flow may be divided into three regions, namely a developing boundary-layer region, a fully viscous boundary-layer region, and a hydraulic jump region. The similarity solutions of the film thickness and free surface velocity in fully viscous boundary-layer region include unknown constant L, which is solved numerically and approximately in the developing boundary-layer flow region. Comparison between the numerical and approximate solutions leads generally to good agreement, except for severely shear-thinning fluids. The boundary-layer solution depends on two parameters: power-law index n and α, the dimensionless flow parameters. The effect of α on film thickness and free surface velocity is investigated. The relations between the position of the hydraulic jump and dimensionless flow parameter are obtained and the effect of α on the position of the jump is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it