MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994248102 · doi:10.4161/psb.6.8.15690

Plants, like mammals, but unlike<i>Saccharomyces,</i>do not regulate nuclear-cytoplasmic tRNA trafficking in response to nutrient stress

2011· article· en· W1994248102 on OpenAlexafffund
Aaron Johnstone, Robert T. Mullen, Dev Mangroo

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Signaling & Behavior · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDirectorate for Biological Sciences
KeywordsBiologySaccharomyces cerevisiaeRibosome biogenesisSchizosaccharomyces pombeCell biologyNuclear export signalNuclear transportBiogenesisKluyveromyces lactisTransfer RNACytoplasmSchizosaccharomycesNuclear geneCell nucleusGeneticsCellular stress responseYeastGeneRibosomeRNAFight-or-flight responseGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cells respond to nutrient stress by regulating gene transcription and various key metabolic processes, including ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Several studies have shown that yeasts and mammalian cells also regulate export of tRNAs from the nucleus to the cytosol in response to nutrient stress. However, nuclear export of tRNA in mammalian cells during nutrient stress is controversial, as it has been recently shown that nuclear-cytoplasmic transport of tRNAs in several mammalian cell lines is not affected by nutrient deprivation. Furthermore, contrary to previous studies, data reported recently indicate that nuclear export of mature tRNAs derived from intron-containing precursor tRNAs, but not tRNAs made from intronless precursors, is affected by nutrient availability in several Saccharomyces species, although not in Kluyveromyces lactis and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Here, we report that plants, like mammals and some yeasts, but unlike Saccharomyces, do not directly regulate nuclear export of tRNA in response to nutrient stress, indicating that this process is not entirely conserved among evolutionarily diverse organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Signaling & BehaviorSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207