Bibliographic record
Abstract
The French Cour des comptes is one of the numerous Supreme Audit Institutions which oversee proper use of public funds. This research project on the Cour des comptes is intended notably to establish how the Court has integrated the broad principles governing the function of supreme audit institutions (SAI) as established in the Lima Declaration adopted in 1977 by the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI), which France signed, together with nearly 190 other countries. We conclude with an examination of the risks inherent in the Court’s necessary passage from tradition to modernity at the dawn of the twenty-first century, and of its capacity to change its world vision. The analysis of the way in which the Court has integrated the broad principles governing the operation of supreme audit institutions has brought to light serious flaws in the Court’s invariant structures, flaws which necessitate a recomposition, in the sense put forward by Jean-François Kahn (2006). The recomposition of the Court’s invariant structure heralds a revolution at its core. Tradition, prestige, ritual and symbolism can no longer serve as ramparts against modernity and its imperatives of accelerating change. The Court’s very survival as a credible and effective supreme audit institution is therefore at stake. Points for practitioners The equidistant position that the Court claims to maintain between Parliament and the Government is a theoretical concept whose applicability remains to be proven. The Court’s status of financial jurisdiction contradicts the flux of its activities: the proportion of jurisdictional activities is giving way to non-jurisdictional activities from year to year. The apparent neutrality of the magistrates of the Court can be questioned in light of the successive appointments of the First Presidents of the Court in the last two decades. The professionalization of the mission of the Court will inevitably prompt a reexamination of the status of the magistrate and the skills newly required to successfully carry out the unprecedented mandates conferred on the Court.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.169 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".