MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994304417 · doi:10.1115/pvp2014-28785

Flow-Excited Acoustic Resonance of Single Finned Cylinder in Cross-Flow

2014· article· en· W1994304417 on OpenAlexaff
Nadim Arafa, Atef Mohany

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinAcoustic resonanceCylinderResonance (particle physics)Sound pressureReynolds numberVortex sheddingMechanicsAcousticsMaterials sciencePhysicsOpticsTurbulenceGeometryAtomic physicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow-excited acoustic resonance of single straight finned cylinder in cross-flow is investigated experimentally in this work. This phenomenon has been investigated in some detail for the case of bare cylinders; however, the effect of adding fins to the cylinders on the flow-sound interaction mechanism is not yet fully understood. During the experiments, the acoustic cross-modes of the duct housing the cylinder are self-excited due to the vortex shedding that emerges from the cylinder’s surface. In order to determine the effect of different fin parameters on the onset and intensity of acoustic resonance, fourteen different finned cylinders with fin thickness ranging from 0.35 to 1.5 mm and fin density ranging from 4 to 13.7 fin/inch are investigated for a Reynolds number ranging from 3.2×104 to 2.6×105. The onset and intensity of the acoustic resonance generated from each finned cylinder are compared to those generated from an equivalent bare cylinder with the same effective diameter. It is observed that the finned cylinders experience an earlier acoustic resonance and higher levels of acoustic pressure compared to their equivalent bare cylinders. This suggests that adding fins to the cylinder enhances the flow coherence along the cylinder’s span and thus makes the flow more susceptible to acoustic excitation. Moreover, it is observed that for constant fin spacing the acoustic pressure amplitude increases and the acoustic resonance occurs at earlier velocities as the fin thickness increases. On the other hand, for constant fin thickness, as the fin spacing increases the amplitude of the acoustic pressure decreases, while the onset of the resonance is delayed. Finally, the effect of the cylinder’s aspect ratio is investigated in three different test sections. It is observed that the amplitude of the excited acoustic resonance depends on the cylinder’s aspect ratio. The acoustic resonance amplitude is weaker for finned cylinders with aspect ratio less than 5 compared to their equivalent bare cylinders. However, finned cylinders with aspect ratio higher than 6 produces stronger acoustic resonance compared to their equivalent bare cylinders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207