Application of aerosol‐spray deposition for determination of fine structure of barley starch using atomic force microscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Starch samples extracted from barley cultivars with varying AM concentrations were imaged by AFM using intermittent contact mode. Two different deposition methods were used: a simple solution drop and an aerosol spray deposition. Using the drop deposition method, starch appeared mainly as small particles and aggregated globules, with average heights of 1.8 ± 0.2, 2.7 ± 0.7, and 5.5 ± 1.0 nm, for starch solutions containing increased (38%), normal (25.8%), and undetectable (0%) AM, respectively. The aerosol spray deposition method allowed analysis of individual biopolymer chains of AM and biopolymer fibrils of AP. The image of normal starch showed individual AM chains with an average height of 0.8 ± 0.2 nm, and an average contour length of 178 ± 127 nm. For increased AM starch, the height of individual AM chains was similar to normal starch, but the average contour length was shorter (140 ± 70 nm). All barley starches showed fibril bundles of AP with average heights of 1.9 to 2.9 nm and lengths in the micron size range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it