MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994364159 · doi:10.1121/1.2973192

Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli

2008· article· en· W1994364159 on OpenAlexaff
David W. Purcell, Blake E. Butler, Tracy J. Saunders, Prudence Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOtoacoustic emissionEfferentAcousticsStimulus (psychology)AudiologySound pressurePhysicsMathematicsMaterials scienceMedicineHearing lossAnatomyAfferentPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research was to investigate the changes that occur in human distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level functions over continuous frequency bands in response to activation of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system by contralateral broadband noise. DPOAEs were obtained using continuous upward ramps of the lower frequency tone (f(1)) while the higher frequency tone (f(2)) was fixed. These ramps were designed to change the stimulus frequency ratio f(2)/f(1) over a fixed range for each fixed f(2) value of 2, 3, and 4 kHz. Contralateral noise was presented on alternating ramps and the DPOAEs with and without contralateral noise were averaged separately. Stimulus frequency ratios of 1.10 and 1.22, and noise levels of 60 and 50 dB sound pressure level (SPL) were employed. Changes in DPOAE level were generally suppression (a reduction in DPOAE magnitude), but enhancement was also observed. For most participants, changes were evident for much of the frequency ranges tested. Average absolute changes for 60 dB SPL noise were 0.95, 0.81, and 0.42 dB for the wider stimulus frequency ratios and f(2) of 2, 3, and 4 kHz, respectively. For the narrower ratio and 60 dB SPL noise, the changes were larger with average absolute changes of 1.33, 1.09, and 0.87 dB. For the narrower ratio and 50 dB SPL noise, the changes were 1.08, 0.78, and 0.55 dB with f(2) of 2, 3, and 4 kHz, respectively. DPOAE nulls were observed and a common response pattern was a shift of emission morphology to higher frequencies with contralateral acoustic stimulation. The method appears promising for relatively rapid evaluation of the MOC efferent system in humans and offers information complementary to measurement strategies that explore the effects of stimulus level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207