MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994374997 · doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0123-2

Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines in pediatric infectious diseases

2015· article· en· W1994374997 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle John Wilby, Emily Black, Claire MacLeod, Matthew O. Wiens, Tim T Y Lau, Maria Paiva, Sean K Gorman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaSurrey Memorial HospitalDalhousie University
FundersQatar University
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineRigourIntraclass correlationFamily medicineMEDLINEMedical physicsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.537
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.895
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5370.895
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.007
Bibliometrics0.0220.017
Science and technology studies0.0100.011
Scholarly communication0.0300.012
Open science0.0150.012
Research integrity0.0210.035
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.486
GPT teacher head0.700
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
DomainEvaluation
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical PharmacySame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207