MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994375280 · doi:10.3201/eid1106.041146

Community-associated Methicillin-resistant<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, Canada

2005· article· en· W1994375280 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael R. Mulvey, Laura MacDougall, Brenda Cholin, Greg B. Horsman, Melanie Fidyk, Shirley Woods

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerging infectious diseases · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan HealthBC Centre for Disease ControlHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMupirocinMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureusPulsed-field gel electrophoresisMicrobiologySubtypingMultilocus sequence typingPanton–Valentine leukocidinCluster (spacecraft)Multiple drug resistanceStaphylococcal infectionsMedicineBiologyDrug resistanceGenotypeGeneBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 184 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains were collected from patients who sought treatment primarily for skin and soft tissue infections from January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2002, in east-central Saskatchewan, Canada.Molecular subtyping analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed 2 major clusters.Cluster A (n = 55) was composed of a multidrug-resistant MRSA strain associated with a long-term care facility and was similar to the previously reported nosocomial Canadian epidemic strain labeled CMRSA-2.Cluster B (n = 125) was associated with cases identified at community health centers and was indistinguishable from a community-associated (CA)-MRSA strain identified previously in the United States (USA400).Cluster B remained susceptible to a number of classes of antimicrobial agents and harbored the lukF-PV and lukS-PV toxin genes.Over 50% of both clonal groups displayed high-level resistance to mupirocin.This is the first report of the USA400 strain harboring the lukF-PV and lukS-PV toxin genes in Canada.T he first report of a highly virulent community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) strain occurred in 1993 in Australia (1), and since that time CA-MRSA has been reported in many countries.CA-MRSA strains are different genetically and epidemiologically from strains commonly associated with nosocomial infections.Common nosocomial risk factors generally do not apply to CA-MRSA, although previous antimicrobial drug use has been identified as a potential risk factor for CA-MRSA (2-4).In addition, reports have documented CA-MRSA as having caused serious, and sometimes fatal, disease, especially in otherwise healthy children (5-7).Most CA-MRSA strains remain susceptible to a number of classes of antimicrobial agents such as aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones.Many reports of CA-MRSA have described strains harboring the Panton-Valentine leukocidin determinant, a virulence factor for primary skin infection and pneumonia (8,9).Over the past decade, MRSA has been observed sporadically as a community-acquired pathogen in Canada (10,11).On the Canadian prairies a disproportionate number of aboriginal persons admitted to acute care facilities are infected or colonized with MRSA, compared to persons of nonaboriginal origin (10,12).This report describes the emergence of 2 different strains of MRSA in east-central Saskatchewan, Canada.The first was associated with a long-term care facility and the second was a clone of MRSA harboring the lukF-PV and lukS-PV toxin genes and generated an indistinguishable fingerprint from the previously described USA400 strain.This is the first report describing the emergence in Canada of the strain of USA400 that contains lukF-PV and lukS-PV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerging infectious diseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207