MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Urinary tract infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients – a two center risk factors study

2008· article· en· W1994435487 on OpenAlexaff
J Spaténka, Tomáš Seeman, K Matoušovic, L Zeman, J Morávek, J Janda, Nicholas Barrowman, Luis Guerra, Michael Leonard

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstructive uropathyUrinary systemRetrospective cohort studyRenal functionInternal medicineSingle CenterRenal transplantUrologySurgeryGastroenterologyPediatricsKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UTI are common in renal Tx recipients and may significantly impact on the graft function. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, and significance of UTI in Tx children. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of 76 Tx patients, median age at Tx was 13.4 yr. Twenty-one of 76 (28%) patients developed at least one UTI during the mean follow-up time of 3.3 +/- 2.0 yr post-Tx. The first UTI occurred at a median of 160 days post-Tx. The RR of having UTI was significantly higher in patients with the primary diagnosis of obstructive uropathy (RR = 2.6, 95th CI = 1.1-6.0, p = 0.032), history of PN pre Tx (RR = 2.7, 95th CI = 1.3-5.4, p = 0.009) and pre Tx VUR (RR = 2.2, 95th CI = 1.1-4.5, p = 0.045). These three factors also significantly decreased the infection-free survival time to the first UTI. Most UTI caused reversible acute allograft dysfunction, but the long-term graft function could not be reliably assessed with SCr. In conclusion, UTI occurred in 28% of pediatric Tx recipients, mostly during the first year post-Tx despite antibiotic prophylaxis. The diagnosis of obstructive uropathy, history of UTI and VUR prior to Tx were significant risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207