Louis Rougier et la Mont Pèlerin Society : une contribution en demi-teinte1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte a comme but un survol des travaux de Louis Rougier dans le cadre de la Mont Plerin Society (MPS), une socit que le philosophe franais rejoint en 1957. Seulement, serait-on tent d'ajouter. En effet, Louis Rougier -seul membre franais du Cercle de Vienne [Marion 2004, 5] -se trouve, ds les annes trente, fortement insr dans des rseaux nationaux et internationaux la base du renouveau libral et dont la MPS, ds avril 1947, deviendra un des lieux essentiels de la circulation des ides no-librales. 2 Une insertion qui autorise Louis Rougier organiser le Colloque Walter Lippmann (CWL) en 1938 -un quasi-modle d'une MPS venir -et qui apparat aprs coup comme sa contribution indirecte mais cruciale ce mouvement du renouveau libral. Reste que cette insertion du philosophe franais dans ces cercles sera insuffisante pour faire oublier certains, au sortir de la Seconde guerre mondiale, la controverse sur ses liens entretenus avec le rgime de Vichy. Lionel Robbins met ainsi son veto une invitation de Louis Rougier 1 Ce texte se base sur un travail d'archives effectu au Liberaal Archief de Gand (LAG) en Belgique et aux Hoover Institutions Archives, Stanford University (HIA). Pour une grande partie d'entre eux, les textes des colloques de la Mont Plerin Society n'ont pas t publis. Les textes cits ici proviennent du Liberaal Archief (voir la bibliographie en fin d'article). Je remercie
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".