Conjunction study of plasmapause location using ground‐based magnetometers, IMAGE‐EUV, and Kaguya‐TEX data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A statistical study comparing the plasmapause location determined using extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and cross‐phase measurements was performed over 50 days in May–July 2000 and 1 day in May 2008. In EUV images the plasmapause location was estimated using the sharp gradient in the brightness of 30.4 nm He+ emission. We have taken EUV images obtained by the IMAGE and the Kaguya satellites, which were operated in a solar maximum and minimum periods, respectively. In the ground‐based cross‐phase measurement, the plasmapause was defined as a steep drop of mass density in its radial profile. Mass density was inferred from the eigenfrequency of field line resonances in the ULF band (∼1–1000 mHz), which was deduced from geomagnetic field data using cross‐phase analysis. The two measurements of the plasmapause have been compared in a same meridian at the same time and very good agreement was found in 18 of 19 events. Our result clearly indicates that the He+ and mass density plasmapause are usually detected at the same place with the error range of ± 0.4 RE. In only one event, the He+ and the mass density defined plasmapauses were not colocated. This event may be due to the difference of refilling time between He+ and other dominant species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".