Effect of liquid viscosity on hydrodynamics and bubble behaviour of an external‐loop airlift reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The effect of liquid viscosity on hydrodynamics and bubble behaviour of an external‐loop airlift reactor within air–water system were studied by an electrical conductivity probe. Carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC) was used to change liquid viscosity (1.00–51.25 cP). Gas holdup increased with superficial gas velocity increasing, as well as bubble Sauter diameter and bubble rise velocity. With liquid viscosity increasing, average gas holdup increased first then decreased, while bubble Sauter diameter was opposite, with critical viscosity µ l ≈ 3.7 cP. The cross‐sectional average bubble Sauter diameter increased obviously after µ l > 3.7 cP, and its size distribution was wider within the higher viscosity. Bubble rise velocity increased significantly and nearly unchanged after µ l > 10.3 cP. Gas holdup first increased then remained unchanged with the axial height increasing. The radial profile of local gas holdup presented a central peak distribution, and the value at inlet was smaller than that at the higher position. Average gas holdup was correlated greatly with superficial gas velocity and liquid viscosity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".