MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994552231 · doi:10.1021/es030407e

Sorption and Degradation of Octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7- tetrazocine in Soil

2003· article· en· W1994552231 on OpenAlexafffund
Fanny Monteil‐Rivera, Carl A. Groom, Jalal Hawari

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
FundersStrategic Environmental Research and Development ProgramDefence Research and Development CanadaU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsSorptionEnvironmental chemistryTopsoilSoil waterDesorptionChemistryTotal organic carbonMineralization (soil science)AdsorptionLoamOrganic matterSoil scienceEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sorption/desorption and long-term fate of octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) was examined using sterilized and nonsterilized soils. Two soils were used that differ mainly by the amount of total organic carbon (TOC): an agricultural topsoil (VT, 8.4% TOC) and a sandy soil (SSL, 0.33% TOC). The adsorption isotherms performed at room temperature were well-described by a linear model, which led to sorption distribution coefficients of 2.5 and 0.7 L kg(-1) for VT and SSL soils, respectively. The organic content of soil did not significantly affect HMX sorption. Over a period of 20 weeks, HMX degraded (60% disappearance) in static anaerobic nonsterile VT soil preparations. In separate experiments using UL-[14C]-HMX, 19% mineralization (liberated 14CO2) was obtained in 30 weeks. In addition, four nitroso derivatives of HMX were detected. Knowing the sorption/desorption behavior and the long-term fate of HMX in soil will help assess the effectiveness of natural attenuation for HMX removal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207