Reactivity of Cp*Mo(NO)(═CHCMe<sub>3</sub>) with Olefins and Dienes: C−H Activation Reactions of Molybdenacyclobutanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reactions of a variety of cyclic and acyclic olefins with the title alkylidene complex (formed spontaneously by loss of neopentane from Cp*Mo(NO)(CH 2 CMe 3 ) 2 under ambient conditions) result in the initial formation of molybdenacyclobutane complexes (Cp* = C 5 Me 5 ). These molybdenacyclobutane complexes do not react via olefin metathesis or cyclopropanation pathways, but instead via C−H activation. Thus, when cyclopentene is the olefinic substrate, the direct result of C−H activation at the β-position of the metallacyclobutane affords a thermally stable allyl hydrido complex that can be isolated. Such an allyl hydride intermediate is not isolable for larger cyclic olefins (cyclohexene, cycloheptene, and cyclooctene) or acyclic olefins (allylbenzene and 1-hexene). Instead, those complexes react further, undergoing a second C−H activation at the allylic position to produce η 4 -trans-diene complexes concomitant with the loss of dihydrogen. Upon heating, these η 4 -trans-diene complexes liberate diene, thereby enabling the 14 e Cp*Mo(NO) metal fragment to catalyze the oligomerization of cyclic olefins and dienes including cyclohexene and 1,4-cyclohexadiene. In the case of the acyclic olefin allylbenzene, the metal fragment catalyzes a dimerization to ( E )-(4-methylpent-1-ene-1,5-diyl)dibenzene under ambient conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".