MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical studies on non-linear free surface flow using generalized Schwarz-Christoffel transformation

2000· article· en· W1994664799 on OpenAlexaff
J. M. Chuang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMathematical analysisDiscretizationChristoffel symbolsBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemFlow (mathematics)Domain decomposition methodsSchwarz alternating methodPotential flowApplied mathematicsGeometryFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with a technique to transform a free surface flow problem in the physical domain with an unknown boundary to a standard domain that has a fixed boundary. All the difficulties in the physical domain are reduced to finding an unknown mapping function that can be solved iteratively in a standard domain. A derivation is first presented to express an analytic function in terms of the boundary value of its imaginary part. Using a relationship between boundaries of the standard and the physical domains, a formula for the generalized Schwarz–Christoffel transformation is then developed. Based on the generalized Schwarz–Christoffel integral and the Hilbert transform, a pair of non-linear boundary integro-differential equations in an infinite strip is formulated for solving fully non-linear free surface flow problems. The boundary integral equations are then discretized with quadratic elements in an untruncated standard domain and solved by the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Several examples of supercritical flow past obstructions are provided to demonstrate the flexibility and the accuracy of the proposed numerical scheme. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in FluidsSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207