Effect of family housing of farmed silver foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) in outdoor enclosures on some behavioural and physiological parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Group housing of silver foxes in large housing systems has been claimed to promote the welfare of the species since it provides foxes with the possibility to express species-specific social and locomotor behaviour. In our study, silver foxes were housed in outdoor enclosures in family units consisting of a vixen and her four cubs. Foxes housed alone in traditional fox cages were used as control animals. Light hour activity, rectal temperature during human handling and restraint, activity of the HPA axis, heart and gastrocnemius muscle mass, succinate-dehydrogenase activity in gastrocnemius muscle and mechanical properties of tibia were determined from the foxes. The effect of different housing systems was more pronounced in the cubs than in the vixens, indicating the importance of earlier experiences on animals' performance. Both the increased rectal temperature and the increased activity of the HPA axis especially in the cubs housed in enclosures show that the foxes housed in enclosures had a greater fear level towards man than the foxes housed in cages. Furthermore, the foxes, especially the male cubs, raised in groups may have experienced stress due to social tension. Although the exercise-related parameters may indicate that a larger available space could be beneficial for the foxes' physical endurance, these parameters had no clear correlation with physiological welfare parameters. Key words: Behaviour, fear, physical endurance, HPA axis, stress-induced hyperthermia, Vulpes vulpes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".