MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1994726114 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-2136

Abstract 2136: Expression of fusion proteins in acute myeloid leukemia cells increases sensitivity to histone deacetylase inhibitors

2011· article· en· W1994726114 on OpenAlexaff
Luca A. Petruccelli, Kim L. Rice, Filippa Pettersson, Jessica N. Nichol, Sophia Skoulikas, Jonathan D. Licht, Wilson H. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVorinostatProgrammed cell deathBiologyHistone deacetylaseDNA damageCancer researchHistone deacetylase inhibitorMolecular biologyHistoneApoptosisCell biologyDNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) are often characterized by chromosomal translocations resulting in the expression of fusion proteins (FP). Some FP have been demonstrated to recruit histone deacetylases (HDACs) and repress the expression of DNA repair genes. This may result in an increased sensitivity to histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDI) due to their ability to also down-regulate DNA repair gene expression and induce DNA damage. We have tested the sensitivity of PLZF-RARα, PML-RARα and AML1-ETO inducible cell lines to HDI in order to characterize changes in the mechanisms of cell death. Treatment of U937 cells with vorinostat results in DNA damage as measured by the COMET assay, followed by cell death. To test the effect of FP expression, U937 cells stably transfected with PLZF-RARα, PML-RARα or AML1-ETO cDNA under the control of a tetracycline-off or a zinc-inducible system were treated with vorinostat and assayed for cell death in the presence/absence of FP. FP expression resulted in increased cell death and caspase-3/7 activation. This effect was found to be largely caspase driven as pre-treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK resulted in protection against vorinostat-induced cell death. In addition, FP expressing cells were also exposed to the DNA-targeting agents Doxorubicin, Etoposide, Cisplatin and ionizing radiation. Again, FP expression resulted in increased cell death. In addition, we investigated the effect of FP expression on vorinostat sensitivity using a PLZF-RARα murine hematopoietic model. A retroviral expression system was used to overexpress PLZF-RARα in lineage-depleted (Lin-) murine hematopoietic progenitors, followed by vorinostat treatment in the absence/presence of PLZF-RARα. The increased sensitivity of FP expressing cells to HDI and DNA-targeting agents suggests a mechanism where the combination of an FP expression and HDI results in an increased accumulation of DNA damage, leading to enhanced cell death. These findings are significant as they point to FP expressing AMLs as a target group that may respond better to HDI-based therapies. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2136. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2136

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→