Cellular resistance to bleomycin in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is not affected by changes in bleomycin hydrolase levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bleomycin is a glycopeptide drug that exerts potent genotoxic potential and is highly effective in the treatment of certain cancers when used in combination therapy. Unfortunately, however, tumors often develop resistance against bleomycin, and the mechanism of this resistance remains unclear. It has been postulated that bleomycin hydrolase, a protease encoded by the BLH1 gene in humans, may account for tumor resistance to bleomycin. In support of such a notion, earlier studies showed that exogenous expression of yeast Blh1 in human cells can enhance resistance to bleomycin. Here we show that (i) yeast blh1delta mutants are not sensitive to bleomycin, (ii) bleomycin-hypersensitive yeast mutants were no more sensitive to this agent upon deletion of the BLH1/LAP3/GAL6 gene, and (iii) overproduction of Blhl in either the parent or bleomycin-hypersensitive mutants did not confer additional resistance to these strains. Therefore, yeast Blh1 apparently has no direct role in protecting this organism from the lethal effects of bleomycin, even though the enzyme can degrade the drug in vitro. Clearly, additional studies are required to establish the actual biological role of Blh1 in yeast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".