MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994785412 · doi:10.3944/aott.2010.2238

Comparison of intraarticular hyaluronic acid injections and mudpack therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

2010· article· en· W1994785412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisWOMACHyaluronic acidViscosupplementationSurgeryKnee painKnee JointRheumatologyOrthopedic surgeryPhysical therapyIntra articularInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives: Conservative treatment should be tried prior to surgical treatment in knee osteoarthritis. This study was designed to evaluate the short-term effects of mud-pack therapy on pain relief and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis in comparison with intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections. \r\nMethods: The study included 23 patients who were diagnosed as having knee osteoarthritis according to the ACR (American College of Rheumatology) criteria, and had complaints lasting for more than three months. All the patients had stage 2 or 3 osteoarthritis radiographically according to the Kellgren-Lawrence criteria. Twelve patients (3 males, 9 females; mean age 54±6 years; range 46 to 67 years) received mud therapy bilaterally. Mud packs were heated to 45 °C and applied on both knees for 30 minutes daily for a total of 12 weekdays. Eleven patients (2 males, 9 females; mean age 53±9 years; range 40 to 66 years) received a total of three bilateral intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections, each interspersed by weekly intervals. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment in terms of pain and functionality using the pain subscale of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and Knee Society clinical rating system (knee and function scores). The patients were followed-up for a mean of 5.9±6.3 months (range 4 to 8 months) after mud-pack therapy, and 5.8±0.8 months (range 5 to 7 months) after intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections.\r\nResults: No significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to pre-and posttreatment WOMAC, HSS, and knee and function scores (p>0.05). The scores of all instruments showed significant improvements following treatment in both groups (p<0.001). Posttreatment changes in relation to baseline scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (p>0.05).\r\nConclusion: Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections or mud-pack therapy yielded similar results in the short-term in terms of functional improvement and pain relief. Mud-pack therapy is a noninvasive, complication-free, and cost-effective alternative modality for the conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Özet Amaç: Diz osteoartritinde cerrahi tedaviden önce zaman kazandırıcı konservatif yöntemler denenmelidir. Çalışmamızda, diz osteoartritinde tıbbi çamur tedavisinin kısa dönemde ağrı ve fonksiyonlar üzerine etkisi değerlendirildi ve eklemiçi hiyalüronik asit uygulamasıyla karşılaştırıldı. \r\nÇalışma planı: Çalışmaya, Amerikan Romatoloji Derneği ölçütlerine göre diz osteoartriti tanısı konan ve yakınmaları üç aydan uzun süren 23 hasta alındı. Kellgren-Lawrence sistemine göre radyografik olarak bütün hastalarda evre 2 veya 3 diz osteoartriti vardı. On iki hastanın (3 erkek, 9 kadın; ort. yaş 54±6.; dağılım 46-67) her iki dizine, günde bir kez, 12 gün süreyle, 45 °C sıcaklıkta ve 30 dakika süreyle, diz üzerine paket tarzında çamur tedavisi uygulandı. On bir hastanın (2 erkek, 9 kadın; ort. yaş 53±9; dağılım 40-66) her iki dizine de, birer hafta arayla üç kez hiyalüronik asit enjeksiyonu uygulandı. Hastalar tedavi öncesi ve tedavi sonrası son kontrollerinde WOMAC osteoartrit ölçeğinin (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) ağrı altbölümü, HSS skoru (Hospital for Special Surgery) ve Diz Derneği (Knee Society) fonksiyon skoru ve diz skoru ile ağrı ve fonksiyon açısından değerlendirildi. Çamur tedavisi grubunda ortalama takip süresi 5.9±6.3 ay (dağılım 4-8 ay), hiyalüronik asit grubunda 5.8±0.8 ay (dağılım 5-7 ay) idi.\r\nSonuçlar: Hem tedavi öncesi hem de tedavi sonrası WOMAC, HSS, diz ve fonksiyon skorları iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık göstermedi (p>0.05). Her iki grup içinde de, işlem öncesine göre işlem sonrasında tüm skorlarda anlamlı iyileşme görüldü (p<0.001). İki grup arasında işlem öncesine göre işlem sonrasındaki değişim yönünden anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p>0.05).\r\nÇıkarımlar: Diz osteoartritinde eklemiçi hiyalüronik asit ve tıbbi çamur uygulamaları hastaların fonksiyonlarında iyileşme ve ağrının azaltılmasında kısa dönemde benzer sonuçlar göstermektedir. Girişim gerektirmemesi, komplikasyonsuz ve düşük maliyetli bir seçenek olması nedeniyle, tıbbi çamur diz osteoartritinde kullanılabilecek önemli bir konservatif tedavi seçeneğidir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it